OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
308 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: FW: [ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not manifested onthe wire
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 29 Jul 2005 23:00:10 -0000
FW: [ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not manifested on the wire
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 29 Jul 2005 22:33:00 -0000
Groups - MInutesWSRX072805 (MinutesWSRX072805.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 29 Jul 2005 20:01:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com> on 29 Jul 2005 08:10:39 -0000
WS-RX charter clarification is effective (w attachment)
From
James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> on 29 Jul 2005 04:27:20 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) modified
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 29 Jul 2005 01:38:17 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 29 Jul 2005 01:38:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 29 Jul 2005 00:04:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 23:08:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 23:03:49 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:51:50 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:45:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i013: better description?
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:43:48 -0000
Prelim minutes of 7/28 teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:31:26 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:15:26 -0000
Issue i013: better description?
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 28 Jul 2005 22:15:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 21:48:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 21:47:35 -0000
Re: NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max messagenumber valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 28 Jul 2005 21:19:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 28 Jul 2005 20:37:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 28 Jul 2005 20:32:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] IRC
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 20:27:28 -0000
IRC
From
Paul Fremantle <pzf@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 20:07:24 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 20:06:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 19:56:41 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 19:41:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 19:37:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 28 Jul 2005 19:10:39 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Dan Leshchiner <dleshc@tibco.com> on 28 Jul 2005 18:57:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 18:57:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 18:48:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 18:26:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Green, Alastair J." <Alastair.Green@choreology.com> on 28 Jul 2005 18:00:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 28 Jul 2005 17:52:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 17:48:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: "Attendance at Redmond F2F on Sep 21/22"
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 17:11:40 -0000
WS-RX charter clarification is effective
From
James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> on 28 Jul 2005 16:48:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 28 Jul 2005 16:23:16 -0000
[WS-RX] Issue i014
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 15:51:31 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 28 Jul 2005 15:06:03 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 07:56:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Jul 2005 07:43:42 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 28 Jul 2005 07:36:09 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Thu Jul 28 00:01:27 2005
RE: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 28 Jul 2005 03:02:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 27 Jul 2005 23:00:43 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 27 Jul 2005 22:53:59 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Dan Leshchiner <dleshc@tibco.com> on 27 Jul 2005 22:37:29 -0000
New proposed issues 7/21 - 7/27
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Jul 2005 20:21:29 -0000
Unowned issues
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Jul 2005 20:17:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 27 Jul 2005 19:38:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Robust recovery from low-resource conditions
From
Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 27 Jul 2005 14:33:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Robust recovery from low-resource conditions
From
"David A. Chappell" <chappell@sonicsoftware.com> on 27 Jul 2005 14:09:35 -0000
FW: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Jul 2005 06:26:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] August weekly calls
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Jul 2005 06:25:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Robust recovery from low-resource conditions
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Jul 2005 05:32:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Clarification on base retransmission interval
From
"Vikas Deolaliker" <vikas@sonoasystems.com> on 26 Jul 2005 23:34:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Clarification on base retransmission interval
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 23:20:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 23:06:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 23:06:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Clarification on base retransmission interval
From
"Vikas Deolaliker" <vikas@sonoasystems.com> on 26 Jul 2005 23:02:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 26 Jul 2005 22:00:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 26 Jul 2005 21:50:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 26 Jul 2005 21:46:50 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 26 Jul 2005 20:05:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 7/14 - 7/20
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Jul 2005 18:58:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Jul 2005 18:13:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 16:14:16 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 16:03:56 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 15:43:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 26 Jul 2005 12:09:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 10:43:07 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Mon Jul 25 23:00:17 2005
Tagging issues in thread discussions
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Jul 2005 02:16:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 26 Jul 2005 02:11:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 7/14 - 7/20
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Jul 2005 02:08:29 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 26 Jul 2005 02:00:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Jul 2005 01:51:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assur ance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Jul 2005 01:11:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Jul 2005 00:35:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Jul 2005 00:18:58 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 25 Jul 2005 21:07:43 -0000
[ws-rx] POSSIBLE NEW ISSUE: WS-RX policies not manifested on the wire
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2005 21:01:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Jul 2005 20:58:57 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 25 Jul 2005 20:49:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2005 20:31:05 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Jul 2005 20:08:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 conf-call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 Jul 2005 20:04:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 25 Jul 2005 19:23:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 25 Jul 2005 19:09:23 -0000
Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 25 Jul 2005 18:58:54 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 25 Jul 2005 17:11:23 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRX TC Teleconf 7/21 (MinutesWSRX072105-b.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 25 Jul 2005 16:57:47 -0000
August weekly calls
From
Paul Fremantle <pzf@uk.ibm.com> on 25 Jul 2005 16:51:17 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Jul 2005 20:49:06 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Fri Jul 22 16:01:28 2005
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Clarification on base retransmission interval
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 Jul 2005 19:28:37 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Clarification on base retransmission interval
From
"Vikas Deolaliker" <vikas@sonoasystems.com> on 22 Jul 2005 18:39:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 22 Jul 2005 12:07:00 -0000
NEW ISSUE: an RM Policy applies two-way
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 21 Jul 2005 22:49:58 -0000
text version of minutes with line breaks
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 21 Jul 2005 22:42:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 21 Jul 2005 22:21:19 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of 7/21 Teleconf
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 21 Jul 2005 22:14:13 -0000
NEW ISSUE: semantics of "at most once" delivery assurance
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 21 Jul 2005 21:56:09 -0000
Prelim Minutes of 7/21 Teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 21 Jul 2005 21:41:12 -0000
WS-I IRC chat
From
Paul Fremantle <pzf@uk.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2005 20:16:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] ISSUE I0006 and Substibutabllity of Delivery Assurancelevels
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 21 Jul 2005 19:42:16 -0000
Groups - Delivery Assurance Substibutabiliy (DASubstitution.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 21 Jul 2005 19:41:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 21 Jul 2005 19:39:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 21 Jul 2005 19:36:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 7/14 - 7/20
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 21 Jul 2005 19:24:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 21 Jul 2005 16:37:09 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 21 Jul 2005 15:43:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 21 Jul 2005 15:19:19 -0000
New proposed issues 7/14 - 7/20
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Jul 2005 07:15:37 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 21 Jul 2005 06:10:06 -0000
Issues with proposals, need owners
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Jul 2005 23:16:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 20 Jul 2005 22:01:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Jul 2005 21:52:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] ISSUE I0006 and Substibutabllity of Delivery Assurancelevels
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 20 Jul 2005 20:17:40 -0000
ISSUE I0006 and Substibutabllity of Delivery Assurance levels
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 20 Jul 2005 19:49:13 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) modified
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 20 Jul 2005 17:17:20 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 20 Jul 2005 17:16:57 -0000
RE: "Attendance at Redmond F2F on Sep 21/22"
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 20 Jul 2005 16:44:53 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Adobe can sponsor two calls this quarter
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 20 Jul 2005 14:51:48 -0000
Editors mailing list is up
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 20 Jul 2005 02:53:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 20 Jul 2005 02:31:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 20 Jul 2005 02:06:51 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
"David A. Chappell" <chappell@sonicsoftware.com> on 19 Jul 2005 23:25:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 19 Jul 2005 23:09:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Adobe can sponsor two calls this quarter
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Jul 2005 15:36:23 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Bob Freund" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 19 Jul 2005 13:51:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 19 Jul 2005 11:45:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 19 Jul 2005 05:42:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Jul 2005 03:15:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Jul 2005 01:42:14 -0000
A rewording of "Sequence termination on Fault" issue
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 19 Jul 2005 01:14:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Jul 2005 01:06:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Emailed attachments
From
Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 19 Jul 2005 00:42:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Emailed attachments
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Jul 2005 00:25:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Emailed attachments
From
Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com> on 19 Jul 2005 00:18:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Emailed attachments
From
Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 19 Jul 2005 00:07:08 -0000
Emailed attachments
From
Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 18 Jul 2005 23:47:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 18 Jul 2005 23:41:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 18 Jul 2005 20:17:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 18 Jul 2005 19:29:56 -0000
Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 18 Jul 2005 19:18:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - Minutes wsrx - 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405-b.htm) uploaded
From
"Chouthri Palanisamy" <chouthri@sv.nec-labs.com> on 18 Jul 2005 18:03:30 -0000
Adobe can sponsor two calls this quarter
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 18 Jul 2005 16:12:16 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 18 Jul 2005 15:36:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Paul Fremantle <pzf@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Jul 2005 11:14:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 18 Jul 2005 04:27:43 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - Minutes wsrx - 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405-b.htm)uploaded
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 18 Jul 2005 01:53:20 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx - 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405-b.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 18 Jul 2005 01:48:56 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx tc teleconference 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405-b.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 18 Jul 2005 01:47:36 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx tc teleconference 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 18 Jul 2005 01:42:01 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRX TC teleconfr 7/14 (MinutesWSRX071405.htm) modified
From
tom@coastin.com on 18 Jul 2005 01:38:48 -0000
Groups - Minu (MinutesWSRX071405.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 18 Jul 2005 01:38:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of wsrx tc meeting 7/14/2005
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 18 Jul 2005 00:40:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 16 Jul 2005 02:30:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in p olicy]
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 15 Jul 2005 19:45:00 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 15 Jul 2005 17:18:21 -0000
[ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence termination on Fault
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jul 2005 15:20:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in p olicy]
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 15 Jul 2005 14:28:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Jul 2005 02:41:23 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 15 Jul 2005 01:42:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim minutes of wsrx tc meeting 7/14/2005
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 15 Jul 2005 01:09:23 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in p olicy]
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 15 Jul 2005 00:41:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 15 Jul 2005 00:40:57 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 15 Jul 2005 00:38:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Jul 2005 00:21:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 14 Jul 2005 23:28:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:47:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:36:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) modified
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:33:39 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller maxmessage number valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:20:35 -0000
[i006] Two facets of issue i006...
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:20:11 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-070705 (MinutesWSRX070705-b.htm) modified
From
tom@coastin.com on 14 Jul 2005 22:10:56 -0000
Prelim minutes of wsrx tc meeting 7/14/2005
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 14 Jul 2005 22:09:01 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Is an implementation supporting a smaller max messagenumber valid? [Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy]
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 14 Jul 2005 21:32:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
Andreas Bjärlestam (HF/EAB) <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:51:36 -0000
Groups - IssuesToHtml.xsl (IssuesToHtml.xsl) modified
From
chrisfer@us.ibm.com on 14 Jul 2005 20:34:49 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) modified
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 14 Jul 2005 20:33:41 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) modified
From
chrisfer@us.ibm.com on 14 Jul 2005 20:33:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:28:55 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:24:05 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:20:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:17:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:08:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:08:36 -0000
New issues July 7-14
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:07:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 14 Jul 2005 20:06:09 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jul 2005 20:05:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:57:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:56:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:52:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:45:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:30:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:22:48 -0000
Discussion on Issue i006
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:21:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Jul 2005 19:06:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 17:56:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 17:38:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 17:36:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 17:20:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 14 Jul 2005 16:13:48 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 14 Jul 2005 15:30:36 -0000
Dial-in number for 7/14
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 14 Jul 2005 15:09:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 14 Jul 2005 13:29:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 14 Jul 2005 13:28:05 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 12:45:21 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 12:45:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 12:00:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2005 12:00:25 -0000
NEW ISSUE: XML Namespace URIs
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 04:24:05 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Document Identifiers
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 04:21:16 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 04:19:13 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Document Names
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 14 Jul 2005 04:15:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 13 Jul 2005 21:23:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 13 Jul 2005 21:10:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Proposed Agenda for 14 July
From
Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> on 13 Jul 2005 15:55:29 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 13 Jul 2005 14:52:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 13 Jul 2005 13:07:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2005 06:12:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Jul 2005 05:43:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 13 Jul 2005 03:33:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2005 23:39:28 -0000
Proposal for raising issues + template
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2005 23:37:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 12 Jul 2005 22:34:02 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 12 Jul 2005 22:02:29 -0000
Groups - ReliableMessagingIssues.xml (ReliableMessagingIssues.xml) uploaded
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 12 Jul 2005 19:23:04 -0000
Proposed Agenda for 14 July
From
Paul Fremantle <pzf@uk.ibm.com> on 12 Jul 2005 16:56:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jul 2005 16:48:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 12 Jul 2005 16:40:44 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Max message number in policy
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jul 2005 14:40:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Jul 2005 12:44:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Vikas Deolaliker" <vikas@sonoasystems.com> on 12 Jul 2005 02:21:34 -0000
Replace first posting with aonther which erases call in info
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 11 Jul 2005 20:27:58 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 11 Jul 2005 20:24:19 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-070705 (MinutesWSRX070705-b.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 11 Jul 2005 20:23:02 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-070705 (MinutesWSRX070705.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 11 Jul 2005 20:07:16 -0000
[ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 11 Jul 2005 19:18:46 -0000
OASIS WS-RX TC F2F arrangements, Sep 21-22 2005
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 11 Jul 2005 17:56:18 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessaging-v1.0-wd-01.pdf (WS-ReliableMessaging-v1.0-wd-01.pdf) uploaded
From
chrisfer@us.ibm.com on 9 Jul 2005 15:40:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - RM-Interop1-Scenarios-DN-Comments (RM-Interop1-Scenarios-DN-Comments.doc) uploaded
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 9 Jul 2005 00:55:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 9 Jul 2005 00:55:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE - minor typo
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 23:43:10 -0000
NEW ISSUE - minor typo
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 23:41:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 22:20:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jul 2005 22:12:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 21:59:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 21:59:10 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
"Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> on 8 Jul 2005 21:06:14 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 21:04:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 20:57:40 -0000
Namespace question - related to interop scenarios
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 20:54:07 -0000
Groups - RM-Interop2-Scenarios-DN-Comments (RM-Interop2-Scenarios-DN-Comments.doc) uploaded
From
dnickull@adobe.com on 8 Jul 2005 20:24:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jul 2005 19:43:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 19:35:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 19:30:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 8 Jul 2005 19:26:07 -0000
NEW ISSUE: typo in P0S expires
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 8 Jul 2005 19:16:29 -0000
Groups - RM-Interop1-Scenarios-DN-Comments (RM-Interop1-Scenarios-DN-Comments.doc) uploaded
From
dnickull@adobe.com on 8 Jul 2005 18:19:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Templatefor Propo...
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:59:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Template for Propo...
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:54:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Template for Propo...
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:43:05 -0000
Re: [ws-rx]Conference Call Logistics (was"Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC Conf call 7/7")
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:41:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Template for Propo...
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:37:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Templatefor Propo...
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:34:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC Conf call 7/7
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 8 Jul 2005 17:10:13 -0000
Groups - WS-RM Interop Scenarios =?UTF-8?B?KHd3dy5vYXNpcy1vcGVuLm9yZy9h?= =?UTF-8?B?cHBzL29yZy93b3JrZ3JvdXAvd3MtcngvZW1haWwvYXJjaGl2ZXMvMjAwNTA3?= =?UTF-8?B?L3ppcDAwMDAwLnppcCkgdXBsb2FkZWQ=?=
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:45:58 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0010 Add Four new issues a thru c fro...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:22:16 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0009 Suggest Email Template for Propo...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:17:58 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0008 Prepare First TC Issues List
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:16:56 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0007 Sanjay to set up editing team Su...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:15:34 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0006 Chairs will provide a set of mil...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:08:53 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0004 The editing team should produce ...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:08:03 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0001 Jamie Clark will put out a web b...
From
tom@coastin.com on 8 Jul 2005 16:02:48 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessaging-v1.0-wd-01.sxw (WS-ReliableMessaging-v1.0-wd-01.sxw) uploaded
From
chrisfer@us.ibm.com on 8 Jul 2005 01:30:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC Conf call 7/7
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 7 Jul 2005 22:11:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC Conf call 7/7
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 7 Jul 2005 22:04:42 -0000
Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC Conf call 7/7
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 7 Jul 2005 21:53:46 -0000
Groups - Action Item Modified: #0005 Chairs will give Tom Rutt Secret...
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 7 Jul 2005 20:36:42 -0000
Groups - WS-ReliableMessaging-1.0-draft-01.doc (WS-Reliable Messaging-01-draft-01.doc) uploaded
From
chrisfer@us.ibm.com on 7 Jul 2005 18:37:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 7 Jul 2005 18:23:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 7 Jul 2005 18:20:24 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 7 Jul 2005 16:53:05 -0000
Issues list proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Jul 2005 15:55:57 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] WS-RM Interop Scenarios Contribution
From
Shivajee Samdarshi <shivajee@tibco.com> on 7 Jul 2005 15:41:26 -0000
Groups - Sample milestones (2005-Jul-07-ws-rx-milestones.ppt) uploaded
From
pzf@uk.ibm.com on 7 Jul 2005 15:41:17 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] WS-RM Interop Scenarios Contribution
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 7 Jul 2005 15:00:43 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] WS-RM Interop Scenarios Contribution
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 7 Jul 2005 14:45:10 -0000
Groups - 2005-Jul-07-ws-rx-Spec Issue Process.ppt uploaded
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 7 Jul 2005 14:24:46 -0000
WS-RM Interop Scenarios Contribution
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Jul 2005 08:51:29 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 7 Jul 2005 04:12:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Action Item list from TC Formation Meeting
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 7 Jul 2005 03:05:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRX-ReliableMessagingPolicy (wsrx-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.doc) uploaded
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 6 Jul 2005 22:49:01 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WSRX-ReliableMessagingPolicy (wsrx-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.doc)uploaded
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Jul 2005 22:00:09 -0000
Groups - WSRX-ReliableMessagingPolicy (wsrx-ReliableMessagingPolicy-1.0draft-01.doc) uploaded
From
umit.yalcinalp@sap.com on 6 Jul 2005 21:32:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in the contribution package
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 5 Jul 2005 21:57:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in the contribution package
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 5 Jul 2005 19:46:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in the contribution package
From
"Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> on 5 Jul 2005 19:44:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] What is the purpose of the redline documents in thecontribution package
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 5 Jul 2005 19:26:32 -0000
What is the purpose of the redline documents in the contribution package
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 5 Jul 2005 18:59:58 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call added
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 5 Jul 2005 17:35:52 -0000
Action Item list from TC Formation Meeting
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 5 Jul 2005 16:05:03 -0000
Minutes of formation meeting posted
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 5 Jul 2005 15:49:11 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX Formation Meeting (MinutesWSRXFormation.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 5 Jul 2005 15:47:50 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2