[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [amqp-bindmap] RE: Cross-TC work product?
Hi All, apologies for missing this week’s TC meeting... the timezone change in the US meant it clashed with another meeting in my calendar. With respect to the anonymous publishing piece of work I would expect that we’ll add this into the (global) addressing standards doc in the core TC which we
should begin working on very shortly. -- Rob From: amqp-bindmap@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:amqp-bindmap@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Huston FYI, BINDMAPers… related to “anonymous publishing” and any other similar topic that comes up. From: Chet Ensign [mailto:chet.ensign@oasis-open.org]
Hi Steve, I saw this. So then yes, you should just decide which TC will develop it, request a working draft template from TC Admin and treat it as a standards track work product. That way, it will end up published with all the other TC work products
on the OASIS Library. You may want to consider whether you would ever expect to see such documents reach OASIS Standard stage or not. DITA for example is going to create several packages of the overall DITA spec (using some but not all) but they are going to include it in the full spec package so that it can all become an OASIS Standard in one vote. XACML on the other
hand has a bunch of associated standards work products that stand on their own and are currently at CS stage and may stay that way. As for 'not standing on its own' - our cover page has a section for Related content and there you can say 'this works in conjunction with AMQP v1.0' - so there are ample ways to indicate that a work product goes hand in hand with a larger
piece. /chet On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Steve Huston <shuston@riverace.com> wrote: We talked about this in our meeting yesterday; it is definitely not an internal committee type of
thing. It will more likely be normative. From:
amqp-bindmap@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:amqp-bindmap@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Huston What do you think folks? Is “anonymous publishing” a normative work, or more committee note? From: Chet Ensign [mailto:chet.ensign@oasis-open.org]
Hmm. Steve, is this a normative piece of work or could it be considered a Committee Note - an explanatory piece on how to accomplish something using AMQP? /chet On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Steve Huston <shuston@riverace.com> wrote: Hi Chet,
--
Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html
-- Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]