Re: [bdxr-comment] Re: [bdxr] Re: [bdxr-comment] Public Review for Service Metadata Publishing (SMP) V1.0 from #BDXR TC - ends May 17th

[Kenneth Bengtsson <kbengtsson@efact.pe>]

Dear Philip

As promised I am letting you know that the OASIS BDXR TC yesterday formally approved a comment resolution log, including the comments received from you during the Public Review of SMP 1.0.

The approved comment resolution log is available here:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/58258/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02-comment-resolution-log%2020160531.xls

And an updated working draft of the specification, including the adopted resolutions is available here:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/58374/bdx-smp-v1.0-wd09.zip

The above working draft was furthermore approved by the TC as a Committee Specification Draft, and in the coming days we will be voting on approving the Draft as Committee Specification.

On behalf of the TC I’d like to take this opportunity also to thank you for the work and effort you have put into reviewing SMP 1.0, not just with your comments submitted to the public review but also for all the time you have taken to discuss and elaborate on resolutions in the follow up process, resulting in a work product of much improved quality.

Best regards,

Kenneth


On 5/22/16, 1:13 PM, "bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Kenneth Bengtsson" <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of kbengtsson@efact.pe> wrote:

Hi Philip

Once again thank you for the comments made to the SMP 1.0 public review! To make the comment resolution and documentation process a bit easier to manage, I have made an attempt to separate your entirely grammatical/editorial comments from your comments related to the actual content of the specification.

The content comments I have separated out and put in the draft comment resolution log here: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=58189&wg_abbrev=bdxr

And the remaining grammatical/editorial comments I have filtered out in the Word document here: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=58188&wg_abbrev=bdxr

Please let me know if you think anything is missing or misrepresented, or if in any way you feel that the documents above do not entirely represent your comments.

Best regards,

Kenneth


On 5/4/16, 12:22 PM, "bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Kenneth Bengtsson" <bdxr@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of kbengtsson@efact.pe> wrote:

>Thank you Philip, for you valuable comments. The TC will convene next time on May 25 to start working through the comments received. I will make sure to keep you informed of the progress and to share with you the complete comment resolution log.
>
>
>
>
>On 5/4/16, 10:10 AM, "bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of philip@helger.com" <bdxr-comment@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of philip@helger.com> wrote:
>
>>Dear all!
>>
>>Please find attached my comments to the BDXR public review.
>>All changes are in “track changes” mode.
>>Most of the changes are just minor, and some of them might only be 
>>relevant for the next major version.
>>
>>If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to contact me.
>>
>>Thanks and best regards
>>   Philip Helger