RE: [bpel4people-editors] Minutes: BPEL4People Editors SC Meeting - Wed 10 Dec 2009

["Luc Clement" <luc.clement@activevos.com>]

I omitted to mention that we discussed that we would be lax wrt our use of “optional” as defined in RFC2119, and as such we would refrain from making specific language changes regarding its use.

 

From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 17:19
To: bpel4people-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Dave Ings
Subject: [bpel4people-editors] Minutes: BPEL4People Editors SC Meeting - Wed 10 Dec 2009

 

Minutes - BPEL4People Editors SC Meeting – Wed 10 Dec 2009

---

Agenda

 

Review input from Dieter and Ivana on the BP-16 WS-HT spec updates

 

In attendance: Dieter, Ivana, Luc, Michael, Ralf, Ravi, Vinky

 

Discussion

·         We met to discuss Ivana’s and Dieter’s input submitted to the mailing list

·         A few issues were identified wrt the comments that had been provided on section 7 relating to task parents. Dieter and Ivana agreed to revise their comments. Dieter posted an update today here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/bpel4people-editors/200812/msg00010.html

·         Pen Ownership:

1.       HT: Based on the input here is the pen ownership I propose for HT in order:

§  Ivana for section 3.2

§  Then, Dieter for Section 6

§  Then, Vinki for Section 7 and 8

§  *** THEN Krasimir for BP-43

2.       B4P: Ravi now has the pen for the B4P spec

·         Next Steps:

1.       Our goal is to wrap up all BP-16 updates by Wed 17^th (and if possible Krasimir’s updates for BP-43).

2.       We’ll then submit the specs for review of:

§  Updates made for: BP-2, BP-6, BP-15, BP-19, BP-17, BP-23, BP-24, BP-25, and BP-43

§  Our proposal for BP-16

3.       Once these updates and our BP-16 proposal is approved by the TC we’ll release CD-02.

 

 

Luc Clément

Active Endpoints, Inc

+1.978.793.2162  | luc.clement@activevos.com