RE: [bpel4people] Food for thought: observations and recommendations

This is not input. We are all aware of IPR issues here. If we want to consider it as input, then we can ask the authors to do so.

Enough said.

From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 08:29
To: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [bpel4people] Food for thought: observations and recommendations

We need to be very careful with IPR here. Unless they are TC members, we cannot consider this input without the authors committing to the feedback license:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=bpel4people

Martin.

p.s I am think of changing my name to Dr Killjoy!

-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@activevos.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:27 PM
To: bpel4people@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bpel4people] Food for thought: observations and recommendations

I’m writing to make the TC aware of a recent article [1] by Nick Russell and Wil M.P. van der Aalst in which they provide observations and recommendations relating to BPEL4People / WS-HT.

This research was conducted in the context of the Patterns for Process-Aware Information Systems

(P4PAIS) project, supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).

As the authors suggest: “We hope that the observations and recommendations presented above will assist the OASIS BPEL4People standardization efforts. We are convinced that an analytical approach based on the

workflow/resource patterns can aid discussions and remove ambiguities.”

[1] http://www.bptrends.com/deliver_file.cfm?fileType=publication&fileName=FIVE%20ART%2DWorkflowResourcePatterns%2Dvan%20der%20Aalst%20%20Russell%2Dfinal%2Edoc1%2Epdf

Luc Clément

Active Endpoints, Inc

+1.978.793.2162 | luc.clement@activevos.com

bpel4people message