[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorials
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Furniss [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: 09 November 2001 13:14
To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorialsSome of Mark's corrections were also picked up by Alex (issue 12) and Gordon (issue 14)I propose we accept the editorials (leaving the items identified as separate issues for separate consideration), with the following variations:line 434 : Gordon's text preferredline 580 : prefer to make the text: "an Atomic Superior will apply the same decision to all of its Inferiors; a Cohesive Superior may apply confirm to some Inferiors and cancel to others"line 880: prefer Alex's textline 910 : prefer to make it ".. to supply a new address or set of addresses to replace the old one." rather than " .. a new address(es) ...Peter-----Original Message-----
From: BTP issues maintainer [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: 08 November 2001 15:15
To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorials<snip>This issue has been added to the BTP issue list
BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorials
Submitter: Mark Little, HP
Category: minor editorial
Submitter's identification: #25
Description:
Word document (1.5Mb) is a marked up version of the spec. with several spelling mistakes and missing words. It also has many of the issues I've just sent you as comments, just in case. (issues now numbered 32 - 56, prf))
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC