[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] Context
Hi Peter: > as issue list maintainer: I won't make this a new issue > unless you ask, but will if you do. Hmm. I'm in two minds. Is it possible to make it an issue for the 1.1 version of the spec :-) I definitely don't want to get rid of the context, but I am starting to think it should only appear in application messages, and not in the transaction-coordination messages. I think it could well be a useful factorisation. For example, someone building a BTP-aware service will only have to understand what a Context is, whereas people building transaction managers don't. The people in the middle (i.e. application developers or more likely those that develop infrastructure for applications) must understand both, but then they are in the right position to do so since they know about services and transactions. How about if anyone else apart from me thinks it's an issue then let's talk about it, otherwise let's put it asside for now. Anyone else have anything to say? Jim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC