business-transaction-comment message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [business-transaction-comment] Specification question
- From: James Bryce Clark <jbc@lawyer.com>
- To: bytecode@Phreaker.net
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:46:22 -0500
At 12:53 PM 10/11/02, you wrote:
Hi
Quick question. Is the BPT Spec required by any other specs. Eg How
does it tie in to the ebXML specs ?
Does it tie into anything on the ebXML specification side ?
Thanks /s
From the ebXML side, I do not think we have fully
worked out the right answer to that question yet. BTP is not part
of the official ebXML stack, which was designed to be a complete solution
set. Yet BTP may be complementary or substitutable, and there is
some work ongoing in several ebXML spec groups to explore those
relationships. The initial results of that work seem to be
promising.
One other issue, where I have no data, is whether BTP
work has the kind of freedom from IPR encumbrances and vendor platform
preferences that we try to enforce in ebXML standards.
My personal view only. I am an observer, not a
BTP participant, so my take may not be representative.
Regards Jamie Clark
PS: "phreaker.net"?
~ James Bryce Clark
~ American Bar Association Business Law Subcommittee on E-Commerce
~
www.abanet.org/buslaw/cyber/ecommerce/ecommerce.html
~ 1 310 293 6739 jbc@lawyer.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC