RE: Remaining tasks on requirements

[Pal Takacsi-Nagy <pal.takacsi@bea.com>]

Peter,

atoms and cohesions are fine with me. Anybody objecting?

Pal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Furniss [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:08 AM
> To: Pal Takacsi-Nagy; business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: Remaining tasks on requirements
>
>
> Pal,
>
> Good summary - I hadn't fully taken on board the adjectival use
> of "cohesive
> business transactions" and "atomic business transactions" - you have
> summarised what was agreed. Would it still be in the spirit of that
> agreement to refer to "atoms" and "cohesions" for brevity in the
> body of the
> document ?
>
> I am working on modifying Alastair's document in the light of last week.
>
> Peter
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Peter Furniss
> Technical Director, Choreology Ltd
> email:  peter.furniss@choreology.com
> phone:  +44 20 7670 1679
> direct: +44 20 7670 1783
> mobile: 07951 536168
> 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pal Takacsi-Nagy [mailto:pal.takacsi@bea.com]
> > Sent: 26 April 2001 07:55
> > To: business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Remaining tasks on requirements
> >
> >
> > After our f2f meeting it is time to finalize our
> > requirement/model/terminology document.
> >
> > Peter, Alastair and Mark (Little): are you guys willing to update the BT
> > model's group draft with the results of the f2f that my
> document meant to
> > capture?
> > Also the agreed requirements list needs to be cleaned up of editorials.
> >
> > Thanks: Pal
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > Pal Takacsi-Nagy
> > Staff Engineer
> > BEA eCI division
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to:
> > business-transaction-request@lists.oasis-open.org
> >
>
>