[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Occam's Razor
Dear colleagues, There is doubtless a spectrum of opinion in the BTP TC over the shape of the specification, given the phone call yesterday. To us it seems unhelpful, at this late stage, to seek to revise the overall shape and scope decided upon in the San Jose meeting, and (at BEA's instigation) expanded to include VCT-composer relations, also officially decided at a teleconference in August. Nevertheless there appears to be a wide sentiment for such a revision. The last thing any of us need is a sprawling, eight-way debate on what stays in and what stays out. The maximum edition (which gives a coherent, overall picture) would have been useful, and so will a minimum edition (which gives a stripped down but technically accurate atomic two-phase coordination protocol). Our chief concern is to get a committee specification adopted soon that can be got out into the market. We are therefore preparing a new submission to the TC. This will consist of a draft specification 1.0 which will contain the bare minimum required for a technically correct specification of interoperation between Superiors and Inferiors, and will entirely omit any informal explanatory material and any attempt to set this core relationship in the context of cohesions, transaction trees, etc. This submission will be available at some point prior to next week's phone call. At that point we will leave it in the hands of the TC as to how to proceed. Of course Peter is prepared to remain as co-chair of the specification committee to help administer the process of bringing the spec out. Our writing capacity will have to be limited to revising or perfecting those parts of the minimal spec that we consider core and vital, including ensuring that the XML encoding/SOAP binding is adequate for a realistic Web Services environment. Other companies might perhaps consider producing some kind of white paper to explain the context and purpose of BTP, which the TC could endorse. Yours, Alastair PS. ACRID should stand for Atomicity, Consistency, Reduced Isolation/Durability. It's a neat acronym.
begin:vcard n:Green;Alastair tel;cell:+44 795 841 2107 tel;fax:+44 207 670 1785 tel;work:+44 207 670 1780 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.choreology.com org:Choreology Ltd version:2.1 email;internet:alastair.green@choreology.com title:Managing Director adr;quoted-printable:;;13 Austin Friars=0D=0A;London;;EC2N 2JX; fn:Alastair Green end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC