OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

business-transaction message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [business-transaction] RE: This Thursday's teleconference


Title: Message
Pal,
 
Actually I was on the last teleconference (though I admit my attendence has been less than desirable). As for unsubscription from mailing lists, I did unsubscribe my @arjuna.com mailing list because I was getting two sets of each message after I had also subscribed with my @hp.com address.
 
Still, rules are rules I guess so I'll sit in and listen to the vote if nothing else.
 
Jim
 
PS - Is there any provision in the rules to allow voting by members who contributed in other ways than teleconferences, eg by writing bits of the spec, or evangelisation or similar? I'm sure I haven't been a slouch on the BTP front even if I have missed a few meetings.
-----Original Message-----
From: Pal Takacsi-Nagy [mailto:pal.takacsi@bea.com]
Sent: 10 October 2001 17:53
To: Mark Little; btp
Cc: mark@arjuna.com
Subject: [business-transaction] RE: This Thursday's teleconference

OK, we should vote on this tomorrow. One procedural point. According to my records the following people are not currently voting members of the committee (even by the most lose interpretation of the OASIS rules, i.e. we count only face-to-face meetings):
 
Jim Webber (HP) - did not attend the last f2f meetings, did not dial in on subsequent teleconferences and as of yesterday unsubsribed from the mailing list
Eric Newcomer (IONA) - never attended a f2f neither called in for a teleconference
Alex Ceponkus - not an OASIS member
Bill Pope - not an OASIS member
 
Pal
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:mcl@arjuna.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:34 AM
To: btp
Cc: mark@arjuna.com
Subject: This Thursday's teleconference
Importance: High

Given the discussions generated over the last few weeks about the shape/content and future of any BTP specification, and the delays to any attempts to adopt, we the undersigned wish to call a formal vote on the following issue, to be resolved at the next teleconference on 11th of October 2001:
 
The Technical Committee confirms the scope as determined by the last San Jose face-to-face in late July and the subsequent quorate and minuted teleconference of 16 August, namely:

To define the interoperable messages to be sent between initiators and the factory, terminators and coordinators/composers, enrollers and superiors, superiors and inferiors (including the roles and responsibilities of sub-coordinators and sub-composers in a transaction tree), and the relationship of contexts and replies to application messages, plus facilities for recovery including message redirection, and compounding capability to allow one-shot optimization and one-wire topology. A concrete binding to SOAP and SOAP-with-attachments is included. Partial role-based conformance is defined.

and further resolves to close discussion on issues of scope in the interests of rapid adoption of the Committee Specification.

Mark Little (HP), Jim Webber (HP), Eric Newcomer (IONA), Pyounguk Cho (IONA), Alex Ceponkus, Alastair Green (Choreology), Peter Furniss (Choreology), Bill Pope, James Tauber (Bowstreet)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SENDER : Dr. Mark Little, Architect (Transactions), HP Arjuna Labs
PHONE  : +44 191 206 4538, FAX : +44 207 670 1964
EMAIL  : mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC