Hi
Krishna,
Yes,
thanks -- I meant only that I agree with Pal that I personally have not
qualified to vote on BTP, only Pyounguk from IONA has qualified as a voting
member of BTP. I'm sure we have voting members of other
comittees.
Eric
Just
as FYI, from what I know, in OASIS the vote is for individuals and not based
on company i.e. each individual has one vote.
cheers
I
agree Pyounguk has the vote for IONA, and no one else
does.
Eric
I
haven't received anything from the chair - I guess maybe we're a little old
for warnings from the headteacher! From my point if view, it was my
responsibility to make the F2F meetings and the calls, and I didn't make as
many of them as I should have.
However, it might be a good idea to get
clarification of these rules just in case the "blacklisted four" might be
able to voice an opinion.
Jim
I believe the oasis rules say that people don't get dropped unless
they have received a warning from the chair. Has anyone been warned
recently ?
Peter
------------------------------------------ Peter
Furniss Technical Director, Choreology Ltd email:
peter.furniss@choreology.com phone: +44 20 7670 1679 direct:
+44 20 7670 1783 mobile: 07951 536168 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N
2JX
OK, we should vote on this tomorrow. One
procedural point. According to my records the following people are not
currently voting members of the committee (even by the most lose
interpretation of the OASIS rules, i.e. we count only face-to-face
meetings):
Jim Webber (HP) - did not attend the last f2f
meetings, did not dial in on subsequent teleconferences and as of
yesterday unsubsribed from the mailing list
Eric Newcomer (IONA) - never attended a f2f
neither called in for a teleconference
Alex Ceponkus - not an OASIS
member
Bill Pope - not an OASIS
member
Pal
Given the discussions generated over the last few weeks about the
shape/content and future of any BTP specification, and the delays to
any attempts to adopt, we the undersigned wish to call a formal vote
on the following issue, to be resolved at the next teleconference on
11th of October 2001:
The Technical Committee confirms the scope as determined
by the last San Jose face-to-face in late July and the subsequent
quorate and minuted teleconference of 16 August, namely:
To define the interoperable messages to be sent between
initiators and the factory, terminators and coordinators/composers,
enrollers and superiors, superiors and inferiors (including the roles
and responsibilities of sub-coordinators and sub-composers in a
transaction tree), and the relationship of contexts and replies to
application messages, plus facilities for recovery including message
redirection, and compounding capability to allow one-shot optimization
and one-wire topology. A concrete binding to SOAP and
SOAP-with-attachments is included. Partial role-based conformance is
defined.
and further resolves to close discussion on issues of scope
in the interests of rapid adoption of the Committee
Specification.
Mark Little (HP), Jim Webber (HP), Eric Newcomer (IONA),
Pyounguk Cho (IONA), Alex Ceponkus, Alastair Green (Choreology), Peter
Furniss (Choreology), Bill Pope, James Tauber (Bowstreet)
----------------------------------------------------------------------- SENDER
: Dr. Mark Little, Architect (Transactions), HP Arjuna
Labs PHONE : +44 191 206 4538, FAX : +44 207 670
1964 EMAIL : mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com
|