[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] Re: This Thursday's teleconference
Like I
have said - I don't believe - unless I am missing something -
that we are far apart - my concern is that we deliver a spec that is 2
things both equally important;
1)
Comprehendible to people that are not tech geniuses : I am not a
transaction god, but have been privy to all the f2f and calls on this spec,
however I do get lost occasionally trying to recall just why we decided to do
this or that or why the spec dictates this approach. A BTP is a very complex
problem and we need to ensure we have suitable "onramp" facilities for people to
understand the benefits of this standards in commercial business systems and the
potential application to their pain points and opportunities. We also need to be
very sure we are answering a real problem people face today from a business
perspective not just a technical stance.
2)
Complete and comprehensive Spec such that we do answer the problem that people
are facing today with a lack of transaction support in the web services arena.
This needs to be a technical spec and will be hard to understand because BTP
answers a difficult and hard problem.
I am
really pleased about the JSR because it means we will get something tangible for
the second point. My concern has and does surround the first point. Again I am
not advocating cutting scope, changing decision, scope or anything else simply
when we review the next version lets keep point one in mind as we
review.
Thanks
for the feedback and clarification - speak to you later
today.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC