[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] SOAP Stuff
Jim (and others), I put the current draft of the text for the bindings, including the binding proforma and the SOAP bindings on the bt-spec list last night. For those not subscribed, it should be in the archive. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: WEBBER,JIM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) [mailto:jim_webber@hp.com] > Sent: 18 October 2001 16:14 > To: btp > Subject: [business-transaction] SOAP Stuff > > > Hello BTP'ers, > > I have a question or two about BTP and its SOAP bindings which > might sound a > little naïve, but persevere with me :-) > > I've looked over the latest SOAP bindings bit of the spec and it all looks > fine in terms of what we are going to serialise onto the wire, the message > split between header/body, and so forth. > > However, I am wondering whether the intention is to use SOAP messages to > carry around BTP messages or whether we can use SOAP RPC. Also, I wonder > whether it would be possible/desirable to put some kind of flag in the > header (for BTP-only messages) that indicates the presence of a > BTP message > in the body so that a SOAP server can pick up on this and take action as > appropriate. > > If anyone has any ideas, could they either bring them up via the mailing > list, or at today's teleconference? > > Many thanks, > > Jim > -- > Dr. James Webber > Hewlett-Packard Arjuna Lab > http://www.arjuna.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC