business-transaction message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [business-transaction] Comments on today's conference call
- From: Alan Davies <ADavies@SeeBeyond.com>
- To: "'business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org'"<business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:30:23 -0700
All,
I am
somewhat surprised and concerned about the process employed in this Technical
Committee.
My previous
experience of such working groups (primarily with X/Open) is that a 'ratchet'
effect is desired, in which, after having agreed which way is forward (i.e. what
the requirements are which we're trying to meet), we all aim to ensure that
changes will result in overall progress in that
direction.
However,
sometimes it is the case that in order to go forward, we must go back a
little.
It is
encumbent on any member making any change proposal to offer a convincing
explanation why the end result will be a net gain. It is also in the
interests of the proposing member to do so, otherwise the work put into
developing the proposed change will be wasted if it is voted down.
Generally speaking, the bigger the proposed step backward, the stronger and more
comprehensive is required the case for why it will eventually be
beneficial.
I would
expect at this stage of development of a specification that the current document
should be under change control, and that any proposed changes are made in
writing, with reference to the current working document. Members should be
given several days to evaluate,consider and comment on proposed changes before
being asked to vote on them. Members should be encouraged to provide
explanations of their reasons for a NO vote. A proposed change which is
voted down should be able to be resubmitted - suitably reworked to deal with
previous objections.
BEA believes
it has a strong case for a making one or more major changes to the current
working specification. I would welcome seeing these presented as complete
and comprehensive change requests, delivered to the group as described above,
for our consideration.
I would also
expect BEA to honorably accept the decisions of the group with respect to such
change requests when dealt with as described above, and continue to be a
valuable and active member of the group.
I believe we
are all reasonable people - let's keep moving forward.
Regards,
Alan.
Optimizing eBusiness
Alan Davies
VP Standards & Product
Strategy
ph: (626)471-6050 (direct)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC