business-transaction message

Subject: Re: [business-transaction] RE: BTP Address

From: Mark Little <mcl@arjuna.com>
To: Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com>,Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:36:54 +0100

> I agree with Peter that it is a binding issue (i.e. abstractly an address
is
> "enough info to get there for the particular carrier").

Fine, but the specification needs to be consistent. The version I'm looking
at refers to URIs and Addresses. Perhaps it should just talk about abstract
Addresses.

Mark.

----------------------------------------------
Dr. Mark Little (mark@arjuna.com)
Transactions Architect, HP Arjuna Labs
Phone +44 191 2064538
Fax   +44 191 2064203

References:
- [business-transaction] RE: BTP Address
  - From: Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>
- Re: [business-transaction] RE: BTP Address
  - From: Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com>