[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] PREPARE_INFERIORS
> > The list is closed for new technical issues. I've been trying to avoid > > getting to issue 100, but there are bound to be editorials, so > we're going > > to go over, aren't we. > > I think that it's useful to close the list prior to a release of the spec. > However, we can't prevent new issues from coming up and some of them (and > I'm not saying the issue I raised falls into this category) will > need to be > addressed before the spec. can be released. Do we need a formal rule for > "bumping" issues across release boundaries? I'd hope that such > issues would > be blatantly obvious as to their importance, but you never know. I'd assumed that "deferred" was one of the possible resolutions to an issue - whenever it came in. Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC