They
are still continuing this thread in their mailing list and trying to figure
out what it is they need. Anne
Thomas Manes has mentioned BTP today in that thread. They will probably figure out that
they won’t recreate BTP, but will need to allow (or not prevent) BTP messages
to be part of the architecture of Web
Services.
-Steve
-----Original
Message-----
From: William Z
Pope [mailto:zpope@pobox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:47
AM
To:
mark.potts@talkingblocks.com; Stephen White;
business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] FW:
Missing in Goals?
You seem
to be making the assumption that chevrontexaco or the W3 ws-arch
group
is
aligned with the IBM statements. Is that known to be
so?
Regardless this looks
to be an opportunity to inform the W3C ws-arch group about
BTP.
I would
have copyed Roger Cutler on this but would prefer to leave that to Steve
since
he was
party to the original email.
=bill
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark Potts
[mailto:mark.potts@talkingblocks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:11
PM
To: 'Stephen White';
business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [business-transaction] FW:
Missing in Goals?
This is indicative of
where IBM are coming from on this subject ( the coupling of reliable messaging
and transactions). Ive attached a exert from IBM Web Services site and is
consistent with what IBMers are telling me with respect to
HTTP/R.
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-ref10/
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-phtt/
Regards,
Mark
Potts - Chief Technology Officer
Talking
Blocks
( Office :
+1 415 255 7424
( Cell :
+1 415
606
9096
8 Email
: mark.potts@talkingblocks.com
-----Original
Message-----
From: Stephen
White [mailto:swhite@SeeBeyond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:29
AM
To:
business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [business-transaction] FW:
Missing in Goals?
This message
posted to the W3C Web Services Architecture group - looks like he's asking,
"where is BTP?"
-----Original
Message-----
From: Cutler,
Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:09
AM
To:
www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject:
Missing in Goals?
I'm a little
concerned that I am not seeing any traces of reliable messaging -- that is,
guaranteed delivery, only-once delivery and so on -- in the discussion of
goals. This is very important for business applications of web
services. Is it contained in some goal without being made
explicit? Will it reappear at the requirments level? Have I
possibly just missed it in the blizzard of email? Is there something
that should be added to the goals with this in mind?
Surely the subject
is in scope -- isn't it???