RE: [business-transaction] FW: Transactions

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Jim,

	Can you post a synopsis of the "Web Services Transactions"
architecture to the WS-Arch list ? It would serve as a pointer for
further discussions.

cheers

 | -----Original Message-----
 | From: WEBBER,JIM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) [mailto:jim_webber@hp.com] 
 | Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:46 AM
 | To: Stephen White
 | Cc: business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
 | Subject: RE: [business-transaction] FW: Transactions
 | 
 | 
 | I don't see how this can be inconsistent with the Web 
 | Services architecture
 | since we (HP) have released a product called "Web Services 
 | Transactions"
 | based on BTP that ships with the rest of our Web Services 
 | platform. Seems a
 | natural fit to us since it complements our other WS* offerings.
 | 
 | QED?
 | 
 | Jim
 | --
 | Dr. Jim Webber
 | Hewlett-Packard Arjuna Lab
 | http://www.arjuna.com
 |  
 | 
 | > -----Original Message-----
 | > From: Stephen White [mailto:swhite@SeeBeyond.com] 
 | > Sent: 14 March 2002 16:42
 | > To: business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org
 | > Subject: [business-transaction] FW: Transactions
 | > 
 | > 
 | > This was just posted.  Is BTP inconsistent with Web architecture?
 | > 
 | > 
 | > -----Original Message-----
 | > From: 	Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
 | > Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:41 AM
 | > To:	ksankar@cisco.com
 | > Cc:	www-ws-arch@w3.org
 | > Subject:	Re: Transactions
 | > 
 | > > Folks,
 | > > 
 | > > 	Here is the link to OASIS BTP initiative. 
 | > > 
 | > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/business-> transactions/. 
 | > I am sure 
 | > > most of us are familiar with 
 | > this initiative.
 | > > 
 | > > 	The specification is at Version 0.9x and would be voted 
 | > in by May 13. 
 | > > It is safe to say that we should be able to refer to this 
 | > > specification for some or all part of transaction related 
 | > > architectural components.
 | > 
 | > It's still early, but as that specification stands, it would 
 | > be difficult for us to refer to it because it is inconsistent 
 | > with Web architecture in important ways. Not that I want to 
 | > get into BTP in detail at this point, but I would like to see 
 | > us implement some sort of "architectural consistency" process 
 | > that ensures that any pre-existing technology that we 
 | > identify be validated to be "Web architecture friendly". MB
 | > -- 
 | > Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
 | > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
 | > http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
 | > 
 | > ----------------------------------------------------------------
 | > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
 | > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
 | > 
 | 
 | ----------------------------------------------------------------
 | To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
 | manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
 |