[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [business-transaction] Email votes - 7 Issues - Ends Tues April 9
Stealing text from other messages... > - Issue 4: Glossary is out-of-date > YES > - Issue 61: Tables of send/receives for each role > YES > - Issue 87: Conformance Level > NO. Per my previous email, I think we need to chew on this one for a > while longer. Bill Pope's proposed wording gets us part of the way > there, but consider the conformance testing nightmare. > - Issue 100: Separation of delivery information from payload > ABSTAIN - I think that this reflects a deeper need to examine the > bindings from the abstract to the only concrete model we have. > - Issue 107: Reply to CONFIRM_TRANSACTION if all is ok > NO It seems counterintuitive to have a successful > CONFIRM_TRANSACTION get a message conditioned on whether > "report-hazard" is true. A success is not a HAZARD. If we want to > change the name of report-hazard to > "be-really-really-wordy-and-tell-me-everything-I-might-possibly-want-to-know" > then this solution makes sense. :-) > - Issue 108: Participant and service identification > NO Per Bill Pope "I think resolution of this issue is a requirement > for 1.0 but we're not quite there yet" seems correct.. > - Issue 109: SOAPAction HTTP header must be present > YES bill cox
Attachment:
william.cox.vcf
Description: Card for William Cox
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC