business-transaction message

Subject: Possible editorial comments on BTP 1.1

From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
To: "Business_Transaction List" <business-transaction@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:54:53 -0000

Title: Message

Dear Colleagues,

Whilst looking through the new BTP 1.1 specification I came across a couple of things that maybe editorials (or just me getting confused again for Christmas)

1) In section 4.3.3 'Enroller' in the table change the entry under 'Enroller receives' from ENROLLER to ENROLLED

2) In section 4.3.1 'Superior' in the table under 'Superior receives' and in section 4.3.2 'Inferior' in the table under 'Inferior receives' there are entries REQUEST_INFERIORS_STATUS, in section 4.5.2 'Status Requestor' in the table under 'Status requestor sends' there is an entry REQUEST_INFERIOR_STATUS, section 5.8.9 'REQUEST_INFERIOR_STATUSES' under 'unknown transaction' has a REQUEST_INFERIOR_STATUS (twice) whereas section 5.6.6 & 5.8.9, 8.2.30 the XML Schema and the WSDL file have REQUEST_INFERIOR_STATUSES (only - I did wonder if slightly different message names were used on the control and outcome relationships, but this does not appear to be the intent).

Best Regards,

Tony

	Tony Fletcher Technical Advisor Choreology Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J UK
	Phone:	+44 (0) 1473 729537
	Mobile:	+44 (0) 7801 948219
	Fax:	+44 (0) 870 7390077
	Web:	www.choreology.com
Cohesions™
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
Home: amfletcher@iee.org