Re: [ebxml-bp] "ediPath" support?

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Dale,

This is killer!

This is exactly the approach that CAM proposed to handling legacy 
formats by providing a
formatter that creates an XML presentation that the main CAM engine can 
then simply
take and process as normal.  Great to see that someone has formalized this.

I suspect this is something we will want to mention in the CAM 
specification as being an approach
that CAM can support.

Thanks, DW
======================================================
Monica J. Martin wrote:

> Dale Moberg wrote:
>
>> Just as Xpath is used in combination with the document envelope 
>> notation, I propose that we consider whether ISO/DIS20625 be 
>> mentioned as a supported notation for EDI or at least EDIFACT syntax.
>>
>> We could adopt Tag Naming rule 6.1.1 (Variant 1) and then use the 
>> XPath syntax over these element tags to specify the segment group, 
>> segment, composite data element, and data element…
>>
> This is definitely in support of the DocumentEnvelopeNotation. +1. Can 
> you provide more specifics Dale to discuss Monday or the following 
> week? Thanks.
>