[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (CAMP-27) Should CAMP surface the names of the application states?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Chapman updated CAMP-27: -------------------------------- Assignee: Gilbert Pilz Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Should CAMP surface the names of the application states? > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMP-27 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-27 > Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Spec > Reporter: Martin Chapman > Assignee: Gilbert Pilz > Priority: Minor > > The application lifecycle model uses names like deployed, stopped, etc should these be normative? > This was discussed at the Nov 12 F2F where we agreed on the new issue and to open it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]