Re: [camp] question on common attributes in wd05

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

The missing attributes and order of attributes are bugs and should be fixed.

The name attribute in listed in some cases. intentionally, as there are 
additional semantics/restrictions on it.

-Anish
--

On 02/16/2013 08:40 PM, Mr. Tom Rutt wrote:
> I just did a quick look at WD05 and noticed a few inconsistencies in the way the common attributes are applied for some of the resources.
>
> In particular:
> •	Format
> The representationSkew attribute is missing.
> The mimeType attribute is placed in the middle of the common attributes.
> The name attribute seems to have a specialization on its use in this context.
>
> •	TypeDefinition
> The representationSkew attribute is missing
> The name attribute seems to have a specialization on its use in this context.
>
> •	AttributeDefinition
> The representationSkew attribute is  missing
> The name attribute seems to have a specialization on its use in this context.
>
> Is there a reason that the name attribute definition needs to be repeated for these resource definitions?