[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CAMP-195) should type_definition resources be optional
Gilbert Pilz created CAMP-195: --------------------------------- Summary: should type_definition resources be optional Key: CAMP-195 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-195 Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: Spec Affects Versions: 1.2 Environment: WD04 Reporter: Gilbert Pilz Assignee: Anish Karmarkar Priority: Minor As of WD04 the specification treats the existence of type_definition resources and the top-level type_definition resource collection as optional. If your implementation of CAMP does not add any new resources or extend any of the CAMP-defined resources, a Provider is not required to implement any type_definition resources or the top-level type_definition resource collection. Now that every resource references the type_definition resource that defines its structure, we should probably revisit the idea that type_definition resources are optional. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]