[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ideas for XTech 2005?
Hi Don, I'm fairly sure Itedo would be interested in participating. As you said, the timing is pretty good. The only problem from my perspective is that Dieter is on vacation right now, so I can't say "Itedo will present a paper" just yet. I think Dieter is back in the office next week... -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Monday, January 3, 2005, 4:38:25 PM, Don wrote: DL> All, DL> At the last CGM Open meeting (Houston) we talked briefly about DL> CGM Open participation in the XML Europe (now called Xtech) DL> conference which is May 24th in Amsterdam. DL> Here are a couple of links which discuss the subject scope for papers. DL> http://www.xtech-conference.org/2005/call.asp DL> http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2004/12/20-browsers/read DL> I think that a paper on WebCGM 2.0 and the DOM would a of interest DL> to XTech attendees being that XTech is suppose to be more oriented DL> towards web technology developers than XML was. And by late May DL> we should be well along the way with test suites and implementations. DL> Since the deadline for submitting proposals is Jan 7 which is before DL> our next telecon, I'm polling the TC members for ideas and suggestions DL> for a WebCGM related paper at XTech. DL> Regards, DL> Don. DL> > Happy New Year! DL> > Since the deadline is the day before our telecon of next week, should we DL> > discuss on TC list? Maybe float a proposal and/or solicit suggestions, DL> > volunteers, ideas? DL> > Dieter might be unresponsive for the next couple of weeks, but I expect he DL> > won't mind if we put his name on something reasonable (e.g., as a DL> > co-author). DL> > -Lofton. DL> > At 11:01 AM 12/30/2004 -0600, Don Larson wrote: DL> > >Lofton, DL> > > DL> > > > Don, DL> > > DL> > > > It looks like Jan 7 is the submission deadline (I think you had an AI > > for DL> > > > this). Do you have any thoughts about papers we might propose? DL> > > DL> > >The most obvious would be a presentation WebCGM 2 and the DOM, DL> > >the purpose and motivation behind this development. This could DL> > >include a demo of a WebCGM 2 application. DL> > > DL> > >I think we need to do something to sow seeds on WebCGM and DL> > >keep developers from thinking that SVG is the only solution for DL> > >web graphics. DL> > > DL> > >I'll keep thinking on this in the mean time. DL> > > DL> > > > Basis/background. By late May, we ought to have a pretty solid DL> > > WebCGM 2.0 DL> > > > with test suites and implementations, for example. DL> > > DL> > > > At the very least, we ought to stir up the membership for ideas, in DL> > > > addition to what you might propose. DL> > > DL> > > > -Lofton. DL> > > DL> > > > >[...] DL> > > > >The conference formerly known as XML Europe has a new focus that DL> > > > >seems very applicable to our working groups. DL> > > > > DL> > > > >It's in Asterdam, May 24-27 2005. DL> > > > > DL> > > > >http://www.xtech-conference.org/ DL> > > > > DL> > > > >I think the CfP ends early January. [...] DL> > > > > DL> > > > >More details on why people here may be interested: DL> > > > DL> >http://usefulinc.com/edd/blog/contents/2004/12/20-browsers/read DL> > > > > DL> > > > >Dean DL> > > > > DL> > > > > DL> > > > > DL> > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]