[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion
I would lean slightly to option B because I feel that an application may be more concerned with the viewer name than the version. My only concern is do we want to restrict the version to a "number". It is important to be able to be able to sort the versions. But what about minor version rolls 3.2 .vs. 3.2.2? -- Stuart Galt SGML Resource Group stuart.a.galt@boeing.com (206) 544-9925 -----Original Message----- From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:09 PM To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion I took an action at the last telecon for making a proposal on defining a method for identifying the current plugin. So here it is... I think we have two options, 1 method or 2 methods: Proposal A: string getWebCGMViewerVersion() returns a string identifying the User Agent being used (ex: Lofton's viewer; 1.0) pros: one call. cons: no real control on string content. Proposal B: string getAppName() returns the application name (ex: Lofton's viewer). number getAppVersion() returns the application version number (ex: 1.0) pros: spec is clear on expected return values. cons: two calls instead of one. Thoughts? -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]