[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: clarify about effective region
Friday, May 13, 2005, 3:45:42 PM, Lofton wrote: LH> In the process of writing the 'region' ApsAttr test, I found that the LH> WebCGM spec could use clarification. LH> 3.2.1.1 (Grobject) talks about what is effectively the "picking region" of LH> an object: LH> -- the 'region' ApsAttr if one is present; LH> -- else the geometry of the stuff within the Aps; LH> 3.2.2.1 (region) is pretty much consistent, talking about "precedence for LH> picking operations". LH> 3.2.2.6 (screentip) talks about "cursor ... over the graphical object", LH> without saying exactly what this means. LH> 5.7.10 (WebCGMEvent) talks about "relevant graphical content under the LH> mouse", without saying exactly what this means. LH> Proposed clarification: all of these indeed refer to the same effective LH> region associated with an APS, as defined by 3.2.1.1 and 3.2.2.1: the LH> 'region' if one is present, else the geometry within the APS (if any). LH> Reason. These all discuss how a mouse operation relates to an APS -- a LH> single click initiating associated link execution, a mouseover causing a LH> screentip, etc, etc. They should all behave consistently. LH> Does anyone disagree? No, I agree. <snip> -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]