[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] XCF fragment
Hi Dieter, The way I look at it is this: If I move the link http://www.cgmopen.org/mycgm.cgm#xcf(myxcf.xml) to http://www.example.org/mytest.html instead of http://www.itedo.com/mytest.html Am I expecting to have to move the xml file also? I would say no, and therefore agree with your suggestion, it should be relative to the cgm file, not the html. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 8:49:19 AM, Dieter wrote: DW> All, DW> I have a question regarding the usage of XCF fragments. DW> Consider the following URL: DW> http://www.cgmopen.org/mycgm.cgm#xcf(myxcf.xml) DW> This link resides on an HTML page located at DW> http://www.itedo.com/mytest.html DW> So the cgm URL is not relative to the html, however, the xml URL DW> is a relative one. DW> Question: DW> where is the XML file? DW> 1. http://www.itedo.com/myxcf.xml (relative to html file) DW> 2. http://www.cgmopen.org/myxcf.xml (relative to cgm file) DW> Suggestion: 2. DW> Reason: DW> a relative URL inside the CGM in a linkURI would be considered relative to DW> the CGM file as well. DW> no strong preference, but it needs to be resolved. DW> Regards, DW> Dieter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]