Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Processing for WebCGM 2.0

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 03:10 PM 6/5/2005 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:
> Here is the result of the research
> I've done on timing requirements to process WebCGM 2.0 though the OASIS
> process (and potential W3C process) to support S1000D
> requirements.

Thanks for putting this together Dave.

One minor comment.  You asked, "First public review must be at
least 60 days (I think our first review only lasted 30 days  is
this a problem?)."

Not, it's not a problem.  We initiated and executed the review under
the old TC rules (before 4/15), therefore they applied.

-Lofton.