RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Implementation Status Matrix

[Dieter Weidenbruck <dieter@itedo.com>]

Lofton,

looks excellent. more inline


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 1:04 AM
> To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Implementation Status Matrix
>
>
> All --
>
> I had an action item to do this.  I borrowed basic idea from SVG.  Any
> comments on layout or contents?  (It comes as no surprise that
> Loft-Soft is
> way out in front of everyone, on his implementation.)
>
> Vendors --
>
> We should start to get quantitative now.  I will accept vendor input and
> manually construct the initial version.  Thereafter, I think I'll employ
> some automation (e.g., you will send me a 1-column table or some XML
> markup, and I'll make an XSLT script to merge into a single table).
>
> 1.) tell me what info you want for your line(s) in the
> Implementation table.
Company 		Name** 	Product 	Version 	Platform
ITEDO Software	IsoView	IsoView	6.0		Windows XP

> 2.) tell me your status on the various test cases.
Benoit will supply this info asap and keep it updated.
>
> I think, initially, we should go with one viewer/product per
> vendor -- give
> results for your best, unless your case is unusual, like two viewers that
> collectively do it all, and have no overlap (!).
>
> One other question:  do we (someday) want to explode the table to
> quantify
> by sub-tests?
I think this is ok for now, we should rather expand the table to include the
other test (graphical stuff) over time.
BTW, did anybody update their ICS recently? ;-)

>
> Cheers,
> -Lofton.
Cheers,
Dieter