[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] for 19-oct telecon
Reminder of the details: Date: 19-oct-2005 Time: 7:00am - 8:30am pt Confirmation: T-68190410 Dial in number: 1- 866-762-7052 International: 1-702-387-3436 Pass code: 84242 # We advise that you give all participants our number (206-655-2254) in case they have any questions or problems. Use prompt 5 for problems. -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:24 PM To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] for 19-oct telecon Dave has asked me to assemble topics. It is mostly loose ends. I'm unaware of any open technical issues, except what's in this message. If anyone else is aware of some, please remind me. The most important issues this week are outstanding (blocking) Action Items, and process/procedural issues: Advancing to Committee Spec: ---------- Looking at Dave's rough notes of 20051013, they say that we're anticipating to vote Committee Spec 19-oct. I don't think that can happen. Firstly, we're missing: a.) ch.5 examples (All) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00074.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00079.html b.) ch.3 examples (Dave) c.) improved figures (Dave, Andrew) Very soon, lack of these will block the critical path forward -- even though they are editorial improvement, we have to put them in (or else have a [graphics] standard with no graphics and no examples). ACTION: in telecon, review and get commitments for delivery dates. (Note. Ch.5 examples should be relatively easy -- they were assigned to the same people who wrote related test cases. It should be a matter of simplifying the test case.) We'll also review other factors re: CS advancement (i.e., Dave will) -- for example, the voting is more prescribed and formal for CS (as I recall). Status of pending W3C Submission ---------- Dave, Lofton to report. URI escaping clarification ---------- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00109.html -- Chris agrees about SVG10 technical interpretation. -- Chris & Lofton discussing WebCGM 1.0 (clarifying) erratum. -- Lofton clarifying same in 2.0 text. Character Repertoire solution ----------- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00113.html (BITONAL) TILE deprecated compressions ---------- http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200510/msg00112.html Regards, -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]