cgmo-webcgm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Groups - Telecon minutes - WebCGM TC - 20060503 (WebCGM_TCTelecon_20060503.pdf) uploaded
- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- To: david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com,cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 10:26:55 -0600
Thanks for the detailed minutes, Dave. I want to be real careful
about these minutes, as the might be distributed to Chris as well, as a
record of the meeting. So here are some suggested corrections and
clarifications...
Correction. The draft says "LH: ... We are restricting the
fragment syntax to 1 in WebCGM 2.0, reverting to WebCGM 1.0 spec when
needed and specifying what to do in all cases." Change that
to, "The metafile is restricted to 1 picture in 2.0. The
original wording of 2.0 restricted the fragement syntax picseqno to 1,
but we have resolved to remove that restriction. We will specify
what to do in all cases."
Correction. The draft says, "We broke them up into the
thirteen we now have by taking the cross product of the old ones."
Change that to, "We derived the thirteen we now have by defining a
new set of navigation basics and a new set of highlighting basics, and
adding their cross products to form the new set of object
behaviors."
Clarification. "LH: "We will stack this for later. SVG
1.1 has target behaviors as in WebCGM 1.0. WebCGM 2.0 behaviors are the
same as WebCGM 1.0 behaviors." A couple of comments...
The first sentence should reflect, "...pending completion of
research action item (BB) into the CDF connection", I think
(correct, Ben?). Next, I don't recall having said the second
sentence (I think it might have been CL).
Correction, "It would be good to note that WebCGM 1.0 did not have
accessibility feature." NOT! As worded, it could be read
as suggesting that the spec should say this. Which I definitely do
not recommend. So change the sentence to something like,
"WebCGM does not have accessibility features like
'alt'."
Correction, "When we updated the sped we missed a sentence in
normative section." s/normative/informative/. (and
s/sped/spec/)
All for now,
-Lofton
At 04:19 PM 5/7/2006 +0000, david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com wrote:
Mintutes of the telecon on May 3,
2006 - please review. -- Mr. david cruikshank The document named Telecon
minutes - WebCGM TC - 20060503 (WebCGM_TCTelecon_20060503.pdf) has been
submitted by Mr. david cruikshank to the OASIS CGM Open WebCGM TC
document repository. Document Description: View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/document.php?document_id=18021
Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/download.php/18021/WebCGM_TCTelecon_20060503.pdf PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]