[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] about transform [was RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Groups - Proposed WebCGM 2.1 ...]
Dieter, Thanks for the detailed contribution. I'll look at all of it more carefully, but one small technical point catches my attention now... At 11:44 AM 9/4/2007 -0400, Weidenbrueck, Dieter wrote: >Lofton,, > >There are several issues with this: > >- user experience > We wonder how many users are capable of building transform >matrices by concatenating them using EcmaScript. This requires quite a >level of mathematical skills. Indeed. But two observations: 1.) in scenarios like Molly/Larry, their tool would presumably provide a simple parameter interface of some sort to their customers, and hide the dirty work of generating the transforms. 2.) SVG is interesting in providing, in addition to 3x3 Matrix, individual transform components for Scale, Rotate, Translate. (Of course, that presents a whole different set of traps for the careless users -- transform components do not commute, etc.) -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]