Test coverage analysis, static10 attributes

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

All --

I'm forwarding Rob's analysis (thanks!) of the test coverage in the 
static10 portion of the 2.0 test suite.  This is his summary only, and 
applies only to Primitive Attribute elements that are allowed in WebCGM 2.0.

He did an automated analysis of element frequency, and concluded that there 
is some coverage of all but the below list.  Some of these are covered 
elsewhere (interp. interior), some are already planned and assigned (LTIO), 
and some ...?....  Let's discuss at next telecon.

-Lofton.

>From: Robert Orosz <roboro@auto-trol.com>
>To: "Lofton Henderson (E-mail)" <lofton@rockynet.com>
>Subject: First results from my test suite action item.
>Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:22:42 -0600
>
>Hi Lofton,
>
>I finally found some time these past two days to work on my shell scripts
>for analyzing the static10 portion of the WebCGM test suite. I'm starting
>with attribute elements because (as I recall anyway) this whole issue came
>up with a discussion of Line Type Initial Offset. Indeed, it is one of the
>missing elements from the v1 - v3 static tests.
>
>I've attached the output file from the script. It's in Unix text format, so
>don't try reading it with Notepad ;-). The output is not well formatted, but
>you should get the idea. It is a frequency count (i.e. number of CGMs that
>contain it) of each attribute element.
>
>Out of the elements that have 0 occurrences, the following are allowed by
>the WebCGM profile:
>
>Line Type Continuation
>Line Type Initial Offset
>Text Score Type
>Interpolated Interior (this is tested in new20tests)
>Edge Cap
>Edge Type Continuation
>Edge Type Initial Offset
>
>Rob
>  <<attribute_summary.txt>>