RE: [cgmo-webcgm] split of getObjectExtent test?

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

[...Note that I moved this dialog from the WG list to the TC list. 
Formally speaking, the test suite is in the TC's domain...]

At 09:48 AM 12/1/2008 -0800, Galt, Stuart A wrote:
> I
> can break it into two tests.   How about getObjectExtent() and
> getOjectExtentTranformed()?

I updated the matrix,
ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm

So you now have two tests to do (the original one is now
"reworking" status.

-Lofton.

 

---

From: Bezaire, Benoit [mailto:bbezaire@ptc.com]

Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:55 AM

To: WebCGM

Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] split of getObjectExtent test?

Hi,

 

I'm wondering if getObjectExtent() shouldn't be split into two? Having a separate test with transforms and getObjectExtent() would make sense to me. It might increase the chances of getting 2 passes on the 'basic' getObjectExtent().

 

Just an idea...

 

Benoit.