[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: should the scale() method have a settab le origin point
The WG was unanimously "okay" with adding the scaling origin as a parameter in the DOM call (and corresponding change to the XCF). -Lofton. At 08:46 AM 2/11/2009 -0700, Robert Orosz wrote: >I agree with Stuart here. I also don't ahve to implement this, and I'm also >slightly in favor of the reference point as a convenience to script writers. > >Rob > >-----Original Message----- >From: Galt, Stuart A [mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:41 AM >To: Lofton Henderson; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: should the scale() method have a >settable origin point > > >I don't have to implement it but am slightly in favor of including the >reference point because if we don't then the normal call to scale will >be three calls (or two if the tranform matrix is used) when not scaling >around the orgin. > >-- >Stuart Galt >SGML Resource Group >stuart.a.galt@boeing.com >(206) 544-3656 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 4:40 PM > > To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: should the scale() method have > > a settable origin point > > > > ISSUE: should the scale() method have a settable origin point > > > > References: > > [1] > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00055.html > > [2] > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00063.html > > > > Discussion: > > In threads [1], [2], it was concluded that it is a > > convenience, but not really necessary. And SVG omits it as > > well. (Which is relevant but not the determinant of this > > issue for WebCGM.) Ulrich reports [3], after working on > > transform tests, that his team *strongly* supports the > > addition of the parameter. > > > > [3] > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00032.html > > > > More opinions? Who wants it? Does anyone object? Is there > > any technical down side? > > > > Recommendation: Tentatively, "add scale origin point", > > pending further discussion. > > ### end ### > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr >oups.php > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]