All,
I
would strongly opt for changing the DTD to mapList. I was thinking about a potential problem here
by myself yesterday after reading Forrests comments, but then saw the “maplist”
in the DTD (without reading the accompanying chapters). I found it odd but didn’t ask, but will
do so in the future in similar cases.
Regards
Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2009 06:23
An:
cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: David
Cruikshank
Betreff: Re: [cgmo-webcgm]
QUESTION: 'maplist' or 'mapList'?
Actually, given our
naming conventions (camel-case) and the way the prose text is written, that
would seem to indicate what is the right answer: mapList.
The only downside of that choice is that we have to fix some tests (and check
implementations).
-Lofton.
At 06:01 PM 4/20/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
Arghhh! You are
right, Forrest.
I was looking at the section title: "9.3.2.2 The 'mapList'
element",
and, "<!ELEMENT fontMap ( defaultFont?, mapList* ) >",
and numerous 'mapList' references in the text.
"mapList" uses our camel-case convention.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/current-editor-21/WebCGM21-Config.html#ACI-maplist
But the DTD snippet, one example, and the full DTD have 'maplist'.
So there is an error that we have to fix in the chapter. (Odd that no one
mentioned it yet.)
QUESTION: do we want to fix it to 'mapList' in the DTD and example, or
leave it as the odd exception and fix the text references to 'maplist'?
Regards,
-Lofton.
At 04:50 PM 4/20/2009 -0500, Forrest Carpenter wrote:
Lofton,
Unless the DTD has changed maplist is what is specified in the DTD
Forrest
From: Lofton Henderson
[mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:20
PM
To: 'CGM Open WebCGM TC'
Subject: Re: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] 4
wegcgm ACI tests update
Don -- I have done a spot check, and there seems to be a general problem with
case of the XML element and attribute names. For example, maplist instead
of mapList, in addition to fontmap/fontMap. Since XML is case-sensitive,
these would not conform to the ACI DTD.
Before I further analyze the FC & UL reviews and do the matrix-update
cycle, could you please fix just this issue on all affected tests, and then
send a message indicating which of the tests were updated?
Thanks,
Lofton.
At 10:23 PM 4/20/2009 +0200, Ulrich Läsche wrote:
All,
Reading Forrest s review I have actually missed this issue:
fontmap vs. fontMap is also an issue in the following 3 aci files:
aciDefaultFont.aci
aciForceSubstitution.aci
aciSimpleFontSubstitution.aci
Regards
Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ulrich Läsche [mailto:ulrich@cgmtech.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 20. April 2009
22:12
An: 'CGM Open WebCGM TC'
Betreff: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] 4
wegcgm ACI tests update
All,
I
checked the four test cases listed below:
aciDefaultFont
aciMitreLimit
aciRestrictedTextType
aciSimpleFontSubstitution
(latest version of today)
as
well as the test cases:
zCompress
aciForceSubstitution
(newly submitted today)
The
issues I raised were corrected except that in the aciMitreLimit case the CGM
file still says MitreLimit = 1 while the aci file and the description both
mention a value of 5.
Beside
this issue everything else is OK from my point of view.
Regards
Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht-----
Von: Don [mailto:dlarson@cgmlarson.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. April 2009 17:37
An: CGM Open WebCGM TC
Betreff: [cgmo-webcgm] 4 wegcgm ACI tests update
Lofton,
I have
update the following ACI tests per UL/25mar09:
aciDefaultFont:
aciMitreLimit:
aciRestrictedTextType:
aciSimpleFontSubstitution:
This
corrects html and conformance errors, typos
and
mis-spelling of aciSimpleFontSubstitution:
Regards,
Don
Larson
Software Technology
Tel:
(713)977.4177 ext. 102
www.cgmlarson.com