Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Groups - WebCGM TC working session added

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Stuart,

I have been keeping a detailed list of some definite "must do" (e.g. 
errata) and some potential "might do" items.

I'll circulate it later, but there is one big category that belongs with 
your high-level list...

At 07:53 PM 3/16/2010 +0000, stuart.a.galt@boeing.com wrote:
>Discuss what is next
>  - Identify unclear parts of the spec
>  - What is on the wish list
>  - Outreach
>  - Examples/Tests
>
>Please bring your ideas.

According to your work with various (2.0) products, you have said there is 
some need for interoperability convergence (on real-work stuff, as opposed 
to just test-suite stuff).  So something like "Product interoperability" 
(with an interop referee or ombudsman or whatever) sounds like it will a 
high-return effort going forward.

-Lofton.