pro-active Interoperability testing?

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

All --

Correct me if I'm misinterpreting...  I think the sentiment at the last TC 
telecon was that we are not interested in putting resources into 
"pro-active Interoperability testing".  After I noticed some slippage in 
some viewers' results, that occurred to me as a potential work item on our 
list [1].  It would involve (re-) testing viewers against the Test Suite, 
all the way back to static functionality like text-on-path.

Rather, it seems that the interest is in "interoperability repair" -- 
addressing interop failures case-by-case as they arise in real world usage.

Thoughts or comments?

-Lofton.

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/201003/msg00011.html