Re: Another WebCGM clarification question

[Dieter@isodraw.de (Dieter Weidenbrueck)]

Lofton,

I agree with your observation.

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
To: <cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:30 AM
Subject: Another WebCGM clarification question


> If you look carefully at the definitions of 'subpara' and 'para', there is
> a little ambiguity...
>
> 'Para' says, in 3.2.1.3:
>
> "Viewer Behavior. The WebCGM prescription for priority of text search
> matching is: 'para' with matching 'content' (1st priority match); 'para'
> without 'content' but with recognizable single-element RESTRICTED TEXT
> match (2nd priority match); or, single-element RESTRICTED TEXT match,
> outside of any 'para' (3rd priority match). Further details of behavior of
> viewers with respect to identifiing matches or communicating the identity
> of matches is not specified in WebCGM 1.0. "
>
> 'Subpara' may also have 'content' APS attribute, and says:  "Viewer
> Behavior. See 3.2.1.3, 'para'."
>
> A sensible interpretation of this would be that the quoted paragraph of
> 3.2.1.3 ought to have "'para' or 'subpara'" in those places where it
> currently says 'para'.
>
> Comments?
>
> -Lofton.
>
> *******************
> Lofton Henderson
> 1919 Fourteenth St., #604
> Boulder, CO   80302
>
> Phone:  303-449-8728
> Email:  lofton@rockynet.com
> *******************
>
>