[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Fwd: RE: [chairs] need more input for DocMgmt system]
+ 1 on this. As soon as I realized it required a client download I had to abort plans to start testing on the machine I was using (at a customer's site) ... and then life got in the way . <quote who="Wachob, Gabe"> > With subversion (or, for that matter, cvs), I'd also be concerned about access to these systems through corporate firewalls which require HTTP access through proxies. While I believe subversion *should* work through an HTTP proxy, I'd be interested in knowing whether it actually *does* work through a majority of firewalls of TC members... > > I'd strongly lean against requiring a client applet for access to the doc mgmt system as there are a variety of corporate policies in this world which limit client software to one degree or another. > > -Gabe > > > __________________________________________________ > gwachob@visa.com > Chief Systems Architect > Technology Strategies and Standards > Visa International > Phone: +1.650.432.3696 Fax: +1.650.554.6817 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:37 PM > To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: Jeff Lomas > Subject: [chairs] need more input for DocMgmt system > > > Chairs: > > We've gone through the scheduled alpha test of the doc mgmt system without much result, so anyone who is interested in taking a look at this please let me know. > > There's a couple of specific questions that we need the answer to before we can proceed much further with development. Just to review, we've tentatively decided on Subversion (SVN) as the platform upon which we will build our doc mgmt system. But there's some additional > functionality that we need to build on top. As much of this > functionality would reside in the client, we need to decide how to build this. > > So... specific questions: > > 1. What proportion of the users of the doc mgmt system (TC members, editors, chairs, etc.) will be using non-Windows clients, and what kind? (Mac, Linux, etc.) > > 2. For Windows users, what proportion of users *do not* have the ability/permission to install a plugin client on their computers? (Some company IT policies don't allow this.) > > Based on the answers to the above, our developing a multi-platform client applet may be the best solution, but this would also cost more resources to do. There's an existing open source plugin that we could start with, but it's Windows only and we don't know if everyone has the option of using it. > > thanks for your input. > -Karl > > ================================================================Karl F. Best > Vice President, OASIS > office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648 > karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org > -- Carl Mattocks co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC CEO CHECKMi v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com Semantically Smart Compendiums (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]