[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Is it? RE: [chairs] OASIS Organizational Voting is Somewhat Absurd?
This is an interesting thread. It might be more accessible to members -- and also better would serve our hope to avoid long threads on this mandated list -- if it were moved to the general membership discussion list at oasis-member-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org. We do want to keep traffic on this particular list low-overhead, where possible, because the only way off this list is to stop being a TC chair. On the merits, I do have some thoughts, but will put them over in the anticipated oasis-member-discuss thread. Regards Jamie ~ James Bryce Clark ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS ~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org At 09:48 AM 9/29/2005, Philpott, Robert wrote: >+1. Its not easy for even moderate-sized TCs to avoid having to send out >the plea for votes. * * * > >>From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com] >>Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:28 PM >>To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [chairs] OASIS Organizational Voting is Somewhat Absurd? >> >>An issue about the way OASIS holds organizational votes to move TC drafts >>to OASIS specifications has been gnawing on me for quite a while. Under >>the current rules, 15% of organizational members have to vote yes on a >>specification. Currently, according to my rough research, this is 15% of >>342 voting organizations or 52 positive votes required *minimum*. * * *
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]