[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] What can Standards Development / TC Administration doto help?
The current OASIS TC process says (2.18): Editable formats of all versions of TC documents must be delivered to the TC’s document repository. TC Working Drafts may be in any format (i.e. produced by any application). All TC-approved versions of documents (i.e. Committee Drafts, Public Review Drafts, and Committee Specifications) must be delivered to the TC’s document repository in the (1) editable source, (2) HTML or XHTML, and (3) PDF formats; and the TC must explicitly designate one of those delivered formats as the authoritative document. Any links published by the TC shall be to the HTML, XHTML and/or PDF formats stored using repositories and domain names owned by OASIS and as approved by the TC Administrator. It would help in following this discussion to have suggestions put in the form of proposed changes to this policy. FYI, the UBL TC authors its primary documents in DocBook using the templates provided by OASIS and generates HTML and PDF from that. The DocBook XML can be viewed directly in Internet Explorer if the distribution is installed locally (doing this over the web is trickier). Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]