[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Minutes of the tele-conference CIQ meeting held on 15 January 2001
Vincent: > I also still believe aligning work > with ebXML is very important; i.e. making clear that OASIS is already > working on a customer profile and making sure this work is not > duplicated by > the ebXML core components group. Since OASIS and ebXML are related > organizations/initiatives, I find this of higher priority than cpExchange > which has been a difficult effort sofar. Karl, could you create any > certainty in this area from an OASIS perspective? Yes, I believe that coordination with ebXML is a higher priority than coordinating with CPExchange. One is friend, the other foe :-) Let's make sure we're not competing with friends. Any chance that one of you can attend the ebXML meeting in Vancouver the week of 12 Feb? </karl> ============================================================ Karl F. Best OASIS - Director, Technical Operations 978.667.5115 x206 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Buller [mailto:vincent@and.nl] > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:08 AM > To: 'Ram Kumar'; ciq@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: Minutes of the tele-conference CIQ meeting held on 15 > January 2001 > > > === Please disregard previous mail - this is the full version :-) ======= > > Hello Ram, all, > > thanks for distributing the minutes on short notice. However, let's kick > some life into this list, as I haven't heard anything since! > > Ram, I read you updated NAML - would you care to distribute the updated > version? > > John, looking forward to the document on security - I hope this > will help us > in addressing potential questions like the ones that CPExchange > appeared to > have got from a hyped US senator. I read nothing about discussion on this > part? Has there been any? I would like to hear what other people > think about > the time and attention we should spend on this. > > I am not sure what to read in the bits about how we are > progressing with the > xNAL specification itself. As I see it we will simply copy and > paste the AND > GlobalAddress into the Mastersoft NAML to create a startingpoint for xNAL. > In December Ram expressed the wish to verify, by making a > comparison table, > that everything expressed in his address format could be expressed in > GlobalAddress. I myself am confident that this is possible, since we *are* > processing addresses from all countries that NAML covers within > my company. > Also, Ram and I have actually compared our DTDs during XML2000 and we > couldn't find any substantial differences, so for me this chapter > is closed. > Perhaps Ram could be more specific about the areas that he still believes > are not covered in GlobalAddress, perhaps by sending some examples or > sending his current draft comparison table with suspected problem areas > highlighted? > > On the other hand I do recognize the need, by the time of our first draft > xNAL release end of March, for some sample data. This is the > timeline I have > put forward, and since I am sure you appreciate the effort it will take to > compile such a sample dataset, this is also the earliest that I > can have it. > > What we talked about at our kickoff meeting is to make an extensible > multilevel definition. For example, for Address this would mean that one > should be able to markup a street as a whole (street&premise:"prinses > julianastraat 26") or in parts (street:"prinses julianastraat", > premise:"26"). This is a next step that we can start discussing now. > > I am currently converting the GlobalAddress DTD to the latest W3C schema > definition; this allows us to be more expressive as we discussed in > December. Ram, did you look at XML Schema and can you have a go at > converting your specification? > > As for contacts with other organizations: I have a tentative meeting date > with mr Wandt, which he has to confirm. I also still believe aligning work > with ebXML is very important; i.e. making clear that OASIS is already > working on a customer profile and making sure this work is not > duplicated by > the ebXML core components group. Since OASIS and ebXML are related > organizations/initiatives, I find this of higher priority than cpExchange > which has been a difficult effort sofar. Karl, could you create any > certainty in this area from an OASIS perspective? > > Ram, did you hear anything from the DocBook people on the e-mail you sent > them? > > Cheers, > Vincent > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ram Kumar [mailto:rkumar@msi.com.au] > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:45 AM > > To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: rkumar@msi.com.au > > Subject: Minutes of the tele-conference CIQ meeting held on 15 January > > 2001 > > > > > > MINUTES > > > > Attendees: John Benett, Karl Best and Ram Kumar > > Absentees: Vincent Buller > > > > Ram has updated the NAML DTD and the document with the minor > > changes suggested during the Dec.6 meeting. > > > > Ram is now creating a table that will consist of NAML address elements > > and Global address model elements. This will be helpful in integrating > > the two models. > > > > The action items from the meeting are as follows: > > > > 1. Vincent to release an updated version of the AND Global address > > model document as promised in the Dec.6 meeting. This document is > > expected to contain many address examples that describe > > about the tags > > that are defined in the model. Given that there are not enough > > information > > to understand the tags and the address structure in the > > current doc, > > the examples will make it easier to understand. Once this > > is available, > > Ram will compile the table that matches the address > > structures of the > > Global Address and NAML. This table will then be helpful > > in integrating > > the two models. > > > > 2. Vincent to set an appointment with Mr.Wandt of CEN and > > discuss about > > their plans of coming up with an XML model for addresses. > > We need to > > convince Mr.Wandt's group to work closely with us which > > will benefit > > each groups. > > This is important. > > > > 3. Karl is waiting on Vincent to talk to Mr.Wandt before he > > can talk to > > CPExchange > > group about working closely with CIQ. If we take the > > story of CEN's > > interest > > in working with us, this will add more value when we sell > > our story to > > CPEXchange. > > > > 4. John has collected documents on P3P and other security > > standards and will > > provide us a report by the beginning of Feb.2001. > > > > > > NEXT CONFERENCE CALL: > > > > February 15, 2001 - same time as this month's call. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ram > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC