[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ciq] Discussion: Levels of addresses
CIQ TC I had a look at David's PPT material on different addressing levels. It does make sense to have this different levels. Though in one picture it is shown that CIQ falls into level 4, the case is that CIQ covers level 0-3 also as it provides the flexibility to define addresses at an abstract or detailed level (though it is not explicit). This is where we can make CIQ explicit to show different levels which can make the life of the users easy in many ways. When looking at Joe's work, it can go beyond level 4 as stated in the David's material. But I do not know under which level (>4) can Joe's work on address presentation/templates and rendition be classified. I would like to know your views. Personally, I think this leveling concept will be very useful to the users of the standards. I see to achieve these levels, it is a question of re-structuring the xNAL data elements into categories. I will be keen to see how AssemblyDoc helps to achieve this. We can also think of applying this concept to other standards such as xCIL and xCRL if applicable. Before we make a decision on our next move, I need your views on this. I will also look into OAG V8.0 Regards Ram > -----Original Message----- > From: David RR Webber - XMLGlobal [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] > Sent: Sunday, 28 April 2002 6:37 AM > Cc: [unknown] > Subject: [ciq] Address Structure Harmonization > > > Ram, > > Attached PPT summarizing ideas from the conference call Friday > on using Schema technology to build layers of deeping complexity > with address formats - tied explicitly to business use criteria. > > Thanks, DW. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC