MORE: [ciq] OLD [new requirements]

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Max,

Supplemental - I missed the most important peice
out of the methods - managing CONTEXT.

To see how this plays out - look at the
presentations from the 21st Jan, 2004
@ the XML WG.

  http://xml.gov/presentations.asp#20040121

Cheers, DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
To: "Max Voskob" <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>; <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ciq] OLD [new requirements]


> Max,
>
> Looking at your document seems to me these are
> all OLD requirements!?!
>
> I like the idea of creating PROFILES.
>
> I'm a bit hestitant over going with the requirements
> document as you have it.  Certainly from the
> address point of view - we can categorize
> communities (aka profiles).  But specific
> technical features (web service, et al) I think
> we should be careful of.   Better to stay
> more abstract - and then look at a selection
> of methods.  People can always bolt on
> technical bells and whistles as they desire
> to our foundation methods then.
>
> In this regard - I believe the UPU has a
> comprehensive and clear set of requirements
> for postal addressing.
>
> What I'd like to see is us taking that and
> creating one sample PROFILE for CIQ
> and UPU using CAM templates as the
> bridge.  CAM is providing a method
> based around UID references, noun,
> and sub-assemblies.
>
> Now we have the open source CAM
> processor available ( http://jcam.org.uk )
> there is nothing technically impeding this
> work.  I know the UPU has some
> excellent test data (and I'm sure there is others
> such as Australia, Japan, etc) that we can use.
>
> By making one such PROFILE - I believe
> we will then be in a position to understand
> how these other areas may also be addressed.
>
> What I see here is that the challenge for CIQ
> is really one of moving beyond what XSD has
> to offer - and using techniques that can
> provide the level of eBusiness re-use of
> address structures that are required.
>
> If you crack that nut - then all these
> profiles will fit neatly into place.
>
> Thanks, DW.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Max Voskob" <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>
> To: <ciq@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 7:15 PM
> Subject: [ciq] new requirements
>
>
> > Hi Ram,
> >
> > As we decided to get started with a new version of our standards I'd
like
> to
> > upload a requirements documents.
> >
> > Could you please, create a folder for draft documents on v.next?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> the OASIS TC), go to
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ciq/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ciq/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>