RE: [ciq] xPRL Draft Data Model

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Ram,

 

This seems oddly repetitive.  Also not sure what the purpose of "audit" part is?

 

Just seems the diagram is telling you nothing like what your text is hinting at!?!

 

Also - surely the notion of circles and groups comes in hugely here.  Therefore there is really TWO models - one for the circle/group notion including privacy and access policies, and access logging - and then person / participant.

 

Then a third diagram that shows how the two parts interact - and how the participants can manage and control access themselves - inspect access tracking - restrict and invite as needed.

 

I'm not getting any of this from the one diagram you have here! 

 

Thanks, DW

"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ciq] xPRL Draft Data Model
From: "Ram Kumar" <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, July 14, 2007 3:17 am
To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: "liz.kolster@ssc.govt.nz" <liz.kolster@ssc.govt.nz>

TC Members,

 

Please find enclosed a draft data model of extensible Party Relationships Language (xPRL) v3.0.

PartyGroup refers to more than one party or organisation as a group (e.g. football team, a group

of organisations together bidding for a project, family) and the party group could be a legal or a

non legal entity for organisation group.

 

xPRL covers only the following types of relationships:

 

- Person(s)  to Person(s) relationship(s)

- Organisation(s) to Organisation(s) relationship(s), and

- Person(s) to Organisation(s) relationships and vice versa,

 

Let me know your views.

 

Regards,

 

Ram