Re: [cmis] Nikunj's blog postings on AtomPub vs CMIS

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>]

Al Brown wrote:
> Agreed. RNC is easier to read. The problem with compact notation is 
> using it with tools. Most tools if they support rng, support the xml 
> version. The rnc2rng (just tried) does not work well on the atom rng. At 
> least, does not generate an xml file that works with xjc.

I use James Clark's "trang".... The following seems to work just fine:

(1) saxon http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc4287.xml 
extract-artwork.xslt name=collected-grammar.rnc > rfc4287-grammar.rnc

(2) java -jar trang.jar  -I rnc -O rng rfc4287-grammar.rnc 
rfc4287-grammar.rng

> The XSDs with the CMIS are useful for creating plain java objects you 
> can quickly use to generate appropriate XML as well as parse XML into 
> these objects.

Now that's the issue. When you use them to *parse*, do the behave 
correctly with respect to the extensibility rules?

BR, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782