[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Submission of CMIS 1.0 Committee Specification for consideration as an OASIS Standard
Hi Mary, At the close of the CS ballot and the Submission ballot yesterday, the CMIS TC has approved CMIS 1.0 cd07 as a Committee Specification, and approved its submission for consideration as an OASIS Standard. Hereby the TC would like to submit the CMIS 1.0 Committee Specification for said consideration. The required submission materials, as stated in the TC Process, are listed below. They are also documented in http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36835/CMI S%201.0%20submission.docx and http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36836/CMI S%201.0%20submission.txt. If there are additional materials that we should provide, please let us know. Thank you. Regards, David Submission of CMIS v1.0 Committee Specification for consideration as an OASIS Standard Submission Date: 12 March 2010 (a) Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TC's document repository, and any appropriate supplemental documentation for the specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS templates. The specification may not have been changed between its approval as a Committee Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS Standard, except for the changes on the title page and running footer noting the approval status and date. * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36486/CMI S-cd07.zip (To be upgraded to Committee Specification status by OASIS Staff) (b) The editable version of all files that are part of the Committee Specification; * cmis-spec-v1.0.doc * CMISWS-Service.wsdl * CMIS-Core.xsd * CMIS-Messaging.xsd * CMIS-RestAtom.xsd * core.html (http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/cmis/core/200908/) * ws.html (http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/cmis/ws/200908/) * messaging.html (http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/cmis/messaging/200908/) * restatom.html (http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/cmis/restatom/200908/) * linkrelations.html (http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/cmis/link/200908/) (c) Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances included in the specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including fragments of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are valid; * The CMIS TC certifies that all schema and XML instances included in the specification are well formed, and that all expressions are valid. (d) A clear English-language summary of the specification; * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36825/Sum mary%20of%20CMIS%201.0.doc * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36826/Sum mary%20of%20CMIS%201.0.pdf (e) A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations; * JSR 170 (aka JCR 1.0) and JSR 283 (aka JCR 2.0), developed under the Java Community Process (JCP), also define an interoperable interface for content management systems. There is no direct relationship between JCR and the CMIS specification. Some CMIS TC members are/were also JSR 283/170 Expert Group members. o JCR is a Java API, whereas CMIS is a protocol-layer interface. The two interfaces can be complementary to each other. For example, a CMIS interface may be layered on top of a JCR repository to provide interoperability between JCR and non-JCR (or non-Java) repositories. o JCR prescribes certain behaviors of a content management system and defines an interface that is fairly functionally complete. CMIS describes a set of basic concepts and functions that can be easily layered on top of existing content management systems for interoperability. Full functionality is not a design goal for CMIS. * WebDAV, developed under the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), is a set of HTTP extensions. It offers some capabilities that are similar to CMIS's. There is no direct relationship between WebDAV and CMIS. CMIS supports multiple network protocols. Its AtomPub protocol binding uses the GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE methods of HTTP but not the WebDAV extensions. o WebDAV was designed to support distributed authoring on the Web using a file system data model. The model and functionality (HTTP methods) are not sufficient to support content management. CMIS concepts, such as typed object, peer-to-peer relationship, rendition, and administrative policy, are not supported by WebDAV. o CMIS supports a simpler versioning model which can be more easily mapped to a content management system's versioning capability than WebDAV's versioning capability (defined by the IETF Delta-V Working Group) can. (f) The Statements of Use presented above; * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/email/archives/200912/ msg00047.html * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/email/archives/200912/ msg00089.html * http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/email/archives/201001/ msg00521.html (g) The beginning and ending dates of the public review(s), a pointer to the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public review period(s), along with its resolution; * First public review (60-day) o Dates: 23 October 2009 to 22 December 2009 o Announcement: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200910/msg00015.html o Comments and resolutions: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/35712/Sum mary%20of%20Public%20Review%20Comments.docx * Second public review (15-day) o Dates: 28 January 2010 to 12 February 2010 o Announcement: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201001/msg00006.html o Comments and resolutions: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/download.php/36411/Sum mary%20of%20Public%20Comments%20-%202.docx (h) An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification as a Committee Specification, including the date of the ballot and a pointer to the ballot; * Result: o 25 of 26 voting members voted "Yes" (96%) o 0 voting member voted "No" (0%) o 0 voting member voted "Abstain" (0%) o 1 voting member did not vote (4%) * Dates: 4 March 2010 to 11 March 2010 * Link: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cmis/ballot.php?id=1852 (i) An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, together with the originating TC's response to each comment; * N/A (j) A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC; * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cmis-comment/ (k) A pointer to any minority reports delivered by one or more Members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Specification, which report may include statements regarding why the member voted against the specification or that the member believes that Substantive Changes were made which have not gone through public review; or certification by the Chair that no minority reports exist. * No minority report exists.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]